|
THE ABUNDANCE OF LIFE
CONCEPT FOR A TELEVISION DOCUMENTARY SERIES
Planet Earth is teeming with life. Only a fraction of all the species
(about 1.8 million) have been named by science, out of a total figure
which ranges from a conservative 13 million to a wild one hundred and
eleven million. These myriad species belong to a number of major groups
or taxa which are the key to explaining the abundance of life. And the
only word which encapsulates the totality and interconnectedness of
species is biodiversity.
Until now all natural history documentaries have been about aspects
of biodiversity. This documentary series for an international viewing
audience will venture into uncharted territory by having biodiversity
as its subject matter.
Biodiversity is a seminal word which is now widely used in the media
and in conversation but is far less widely understood. The series will
bridge the gap in understanding by not only explaining the basic science
of biodiversity’s ultimate and compelling inclusiveness, but
by also enabling the audience to appreciate what it is like to live
cheek by jowl with outstanding biodiversity. Like it or not, biodiversity
is the only game in town. It is inescapable, ceaseless and everywhere.
There are millions of people worldwide who are interested in bio-diversity
and are concerned about the threats to its sustainability. Their numbers
are rapidly increasing and it is high time for them to be better informed
about a subject which they sense is crucial to the well-being of our
planet. These millions alone would provide a ready-made audience for
the series, justifying its blue chip designation. By simultaneously
addressing both the audience’s interest and its concern, the series
would have two powerful hooks with which to lure the viewer.
This landmark series will challenge certain conventions of the natural
history documentary, for instance, concerning the range and number of
species shown, the criteria for selecting locations, and the series’
emphasis on what is regarded as important.
|
|
<< back to main Blog Page << |
| |
DISCUSSION PAPER
By Peter Kuttner: April 2007 PREAMBLE
The purpose of this paper is to argue the need, at long last,
for a wildlife documentary series which will go that step further and
tackle the subject of biodiversity head on, rather than continue to focus
on aspects of biodiversity and to consider some key requirements for
and major implications of, making such a series.
The idea for a documentary series on biodiversity results from
an ongoing Video Archive project of mine which I began in 1998, recording
the biodiversity of Tamborine Mountain, my home in mega-diverse, sub-tropical
South East Queensland, Australia.
My finished archive to date is on twelve DVDs and comprises thousands
of shots showing rainforest, fungi, earth, orchids,
plants, vegetables, fruit, the weather, birds, reptiles, fish, insects,
marsupials, grasses, lichen, moss, vines, frogs, worms, leeches, snails
and more.
In as much as the archive is about Tamborine Mountain’s bio-diversity,
which is on a par with that of nearby World Heritage-listed wilderness
areas, it is also about presenting biodiversity as
a subject on digital video – a subject which I am now exploring
with an HD camera as I add to the archive.
KEY REQUIREMENTS
One key requirement for making this documentary series is to explain
in a basic way, the science of biodiversity.
|
|
|
 |

Identifying
Species Linnaeus’ system of species identification, dating
from the eighteenth century, still holds good with its binomial method
of naming species – which cuts across the variability and unreliability
of common names – and its placing of species
into a heirarchy of ever larger groups, now culminating in domains or
superkingdoms, via genus, family, order, class, phylum and kingdom. A
consequence of the enormous increase in the number of species known to
science has been the addition of numerous ranks to Linnaeus’ original
heirarchy. Identifying and naming species conforms to four strict, internationally
agreed codes of nomenclature, each main-
tained by its corresponding learned body.
Grouping Species
The renowned American entomologist and inspiring conser-vationist,
E.O.
Wilson, who in 1988 was the first person
to use the word ‘biodiversity’ in print, is extremely helpful
when it comes to surveying the totality of recorded species. According
to him, all the earth’s species known to science can be gathered
into eight groups, dominated by insects and higher plants and including
viruses and bacteria. His species-scape, which excludes viruses and some
minor invertebrate groups, yields nineteen major groupings, of which mammals
are the least numerous – meaning that there are more species of
am-phibians, bacteria and sponges. For good measure, Wilson
also identifies six major higher plant groups and eighteen
major groups of animals. Only one of the nineteen groupings
in the species-scape, Echinodermata, is exclusively oceanic, although
two more are overwhelmingly so. But within these groupings there are freshwater
sponges and Hydra. The terrestrial groupings occur on most of the earth’s
land, although not all occur in true desert and the frozen world of perpetual
ice. Only one of the groupings, Amphibians, is exclusively terrestrial.
Insects are overwhelmingly so, but there are some dozen genuine marine
insect species. Most known species are land-based, thanks to the insects
and higher plants, which account for more than two thirds of the total.
Relationships Between Species
Just as all species can be placed into a number of broad groups,
the countless ways in which species interact with other species can be
deciphered from just five pivotal kinds of relationship, namely: predator/prey,
symbiotic, parasitic, co-operative, competitive. The documentary will
cite examples of the relation-ships which commonly occur between different
flora or fauna species and between flora and fauna species – such
as that between plants and frugivores – and will touch on the myriad
relationships Homo sapiens has with other life forms, so that the viewer
will be able to sense the interconnectedness of all the species.

|
|
|
| |
MAJOR IMPLICATIONS
Because of its subject matter the series will challenge certain conventions of the natural history documentary, for instance concerning the range and number of species shown, the criteria for choosing locations and the series’ emphasis – what is held to be important.
Range and Number of Species
The long and fascinating history of the Linnaean system of species identification is worth recounting, since it remains the starting point for how we make sense out of the presence of all the species.
E.O. Wilson’s groupings, whether of all known species, or of animals, or higher plants, or his species-scape, provide a manageable context for defining the range of species from which the series will select the examples it brings to the screen. By emphasising relationships between species based on the pivotal kinds of relationship, rather than life cycles, the interconnectedness of species which is at the heart of the meaning of biodiversity, will be revealed.
Criteria for Choosing Locations
In order to indicate the conditions in which biodiversity exists on earth, the series will need to be filmed in many different locations - at the polar regions, on shore, prairie, ocean floor and mountain peak, in mangrove, mine, cave, volcanic crater, desert, forests, river, lake and sea, in the soil and the air and in the built environment.
But, in order for the audience to appreciate what it is like to live cheek by jowl with outstanding biodiversity, imagine instead of choosing some vast river or marine park, as the principal location for the series, choosing a separate and mega-diverse place which can be seen in its entirety from 1500 metres in the air. A place with which the audience can all the more readily identify because the biodiversity co-exists and interacts with a human population living in much the same way as the audience. A place where the biodiversity can be revealed in its complete setting, an island in the sky, allowing the viewer the realisation that all the species shown, occur, crucially, in this one small place on earth.
What is Important
The series cannot be about ‘picking favourites’, the stock-in-trade of so many natural history documentaries. It is axiomatic that each of life’s varied and abundant forms in a series about biodiversity, is as worthy of inclusion as any other, even though some species play a crucial role in maintaining variety within a given ecosystem and others don’t.
There will neither be the need nor the time for the series to dwell on another stock-in-trade, what I call death as a spectator sport. Instead, the series will show examples of the key relationships between species, of which predator/prey is but one.
A profound reality about biodiversity is that it is everywhere, where you expect it to be and where you don’t. It is present and active 24 hours a day, every day of the year. One of the exciting challenges of making the series will be to take this reality to heart. In terms of the principal location it will mean devising a shooting schedule to cover nocturnal species as fully as diurnal species.
|
|
|